If death is the unequivocal and permanent end of our existence, the question arises whether it is a bad thing to die. There is conspicuous disagreement about the matter:
Your task is to critique the stated argument in terms of its logical soundness and in terms of the strength of the evidence offered in support of the argument. Sample Analysis-of-an-Argument Writing Prompt The following appeared in a memorandum issued by the human-resources department of Capital Bank: In order to reverse these trends, Capital should adopt a company-wide "casual Friday" policy, under which all employees would be permitted, and even encouraged, to dress casually for work every Friday.
After all, most companies in the software industry allow their workers to dress casually for work anytime they want; and those workers often remark that this policy enhances their job satisfaction. Moreover, most software firms experience lower rates of employee absenteeism and attrition than companies in other industries, including banking.
In your discussion, you should analyze the argument's line of reasoning and use of evidence.
Following is an essay that responds to the above prompt. As you read the sample essay, keep in mind: Each of the three body paragraphs isolates and discusses a different problem with the argument. A typical GMAT argument will contain major reasoning flaws.
Some phrases are highlighted to help you see the structure of the essay and how it responds to the directive. The exam's basic word processor does not provide this feature.
The essay is intended as a benchmark response — one that would earn a top score of 6 based on the AWA evaluation and scoring system. Though brief enough to plan and type in 30 minutes, it was not composed under a strict time limit.
Be assured that you can attain a top score with an essay that's less polished and somewhat briefer than this one. This conclusion, based solely on certain comparisons with the software industry, is tenuous at best.
First of all, the memo assumes that since software workers prefer casual attire, so would bank employees. But this might not be so.
People attracted to finance jobs are generally more oriented toward authority and wealth, and thus prefer to wear suits to impress and intimidate. Therefore, a "casual Friday" policy might have no positive impact on morale at Capital. It might even backfire, prompting even more workers to leave the company.
But would just one casual day per week be enough to reduce absenteeism and attrition? A high absenteeism rate might be due instead to other working conditions, such as poor ventilation or cafeteria food, while a high attrition rate might be explained by such factors as inadequate salaries or benefits.
Finally, the statistics cited in the memo seem unreliable. One cannot draw any firm conclusions about job satisfaction from "remarks" made "often" by software workers unless the remarks are backed up by a proper survey of a sufficiently large and representative sample.Oct 05, · The pun seems inevitable: In Wednesday morning’s oral argument in Class v.
United States, the justices held a short seminar on the implicit effect of criminal guilty ph-vs.com the end, Rodney Class may win a remand – but unless the Supreme Court writes carefully, the government could inadvertently prevail in a much larger controversy.
THE GODELIAN ARGUMENT J. R. Lucas Fellow of Merton College, Oxford In I read a paper to the Oxford Philosophical Society entitled "Minds, Machines and Godel".
On the Analysis of Argument AWA, your job is to critique the argument presented. Essentially, you will say why the argument is flawed, how it relies on unproven assumptions etc. Analysis is the process of breaking a complex topic or substance into smaller parts in order to gain a better understanding of it.
The technique has been applied in the study of mathematics and logic since before Aristotle (– B.C.), though analysis as a formal concept is a relatively recent development.. The word comes from the Ancient Greek ἀνάλυσις (analysis, "a breaking up. An argument sounds like something to avoid rather than something to learn about and practice.
If we were talking about an argument that is a heated disagreement, then avoidance would be a good option. Chinese Room Argument. The Chinese room argument is a thought experiment of John Searle (a) and associated () derivation.
It is one of the best known and widely credited counters to claims of artificial intelligence (AI)that is, to claims that computers do or at least can (someday might) think.
According to Searle's original presentation, the argument is based on two key claims.
|Who is Afraid of Carl von Clausewitz? A Guide to the Perplexed||Literature[ edit ] Literary criticism is the analysis of literature. The focus can be as diverse as the analysis of Homer or Freud.|
|The Next Chapter in Story Development||This post was updated at 2:|